As part of my internship after the end of my second year of engineering at Krishna Defence and Allied Industries, I worked on developing an autonomous mobile robot that uses Ultra-Wideband (UWB) technology for precise localization. The goal was to achieve centimeter-level accuracy in both indoor and outdoor environments, replacing traditional encoder-based localization with a more robust and drift-free solution.
We started by defining the requirements: achieve 1–2 cm localization accuracy in a 200 × 200 m area, keep costs low, ensure the system is autonomous and weather-independent, and minimize maintenance for use in a naval dockyard.
We compared several technologies (Bluetooth, LoRaWAN, RFID, NFC, radar, CCTV, IR, hyperspectral) and found UWB to be the best fit for high-precision localization. UWB needed careful tuning to reach the required accuracy.
After researching available options, we selected the Qorvo DWM3001CDK UWB development kit for testing. We also gathered other electronics to build a basic mobile robot platform for lab experiments.
We built a simple robot using a Raspberry Pi 4B (running ROS), a DWM3001CDK UWB tag, a G-DOF IMU for orientation, and basic DC motors. We performed range and accuracy tests both indoors and outdoors, and used SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) to map the environment by combining UWB and LIDAR data.
We successfully localized the robot within a 2 × 2 m area indoors, achieving consistent accuracy and reliable autonomous navigation.
We set up four UWB anchors at the corners of a 7 × 7 m square outdoors and demonstrated that the robot could localize itself and navigate autonomously using only UWB and IMU data (no wheel encoders or LIDAR for this test).
We scaled up the system to a 50 × 60 m area, using the same 4-anchor + 1-tag setup. We verified the accuracy using a total station, confirming the system's scalability.
UWB localization is based on measuring the distance between a mobile tag (on the robot) and several fixed anchors. The robot calculates its position using trilateration, which means it finds its location by measuring its distance from at least three known points (anchors). We used four anchors for better accuracy and redundancy.
During testing, we experimented with different UWB settings to optimize for range, accuracy, and update rate. Below are the main configurations and results:
| Test Scenario | Preamble Length | PAC Size | Data Rate | Range Achieved | Accuracy | Key Time Delays (units) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indoor/Outdoor Small Area | 128 | 8 | 6.8 Mbps | 10 m | ±2 cm |
poll_TX_to_response_RX: 2400 response_RX_to_final_TX: 2400 response_RX_timeout: 1200 |
| Outdoor Medium Range | 256 | 16/32 | 6.8 Mbps | 50 m | ±10 cm |
poll_TX_to_response_RX: 1500 response_RX_to_final_TX: 1500 response_RX_timeout: 1200 |
| Large-Scale Field (Custom Firmware) | 512 | 32 | 6.8 Mbps | 315 m | ±40 cm |
poll_TX_to_response_RX: 2400 response_RX_to_final_TX: 2400 response_RX_timeout: 1200 |
Note: The time delays are in UWB device time units and were tuned for each scenario to maximize stability and accuracy. The large-scale accuracy was mainly limited by physical setup errors, not the UWB system itself.
Custom-built autonomous bot with UWB sensors and navigation systems
Ultra-Wideband (UWB) sensors mounted on the bot for precise localization
Bot teleoperation demo showing TurtleBot-like movement capabilities
KDAIL navigation system in action during testing phase
Indoor localization and navigation test using UWB and LIDAR
Testing the bot in a 10m × 10m area with precise UWB localization